Parallelism & Comparison


PARALLELISM & COMPARISON

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

·         Parallelism means that items that form a pair (two items) or items that form a series (more than two items) have the same grammatical form (are worded the same way).
·         Sentence elements that are alike in function should also be alike in construction.  These elements should be in the same grammatical form so that they are parallel.

·         Lack of parallel structure occurs when parts of a sentence should be in parallel grammatical form (should be worded the same way) but are not.

·          Parallel structure adds both clout and clarity to your writing.
·         When you use parallel structure, you increase the readability of your writing by creating word patterns readers can follow easily.

Five parallelism rules
1.  Use parallel structure with elements joined by coordinating conjunctions. (FANBOYS)
2.  Use parallel structure with elements in lists or in a series.
 He described skiing in the Alps, swimming in the Adriatic, and the drive across the Sahara Desert. (Faulty parallelism)
He described skiing in the Alps, swimming in the Adriatic, and driving across the Sahara Desert. (Parallel)
3.  Use parallel structure with elements being compared. (X is more than / better than Y)
4.  Use parallel structure with elements joined by a linking verb or a verb of being.
5.  Use parallel structure with elements joined by a correlative conjunction.

FAULTY COMPARISON

Any comparison between two or more items must have three characteristics:
                   completeness        consistency            clarity
    1. Completeness
    At least two items are needed for a comparison.
     Example 1 - incorrect:
       
    The above comparison compares Blotto ice cream's fat content to nothing.
     Example 1 - correct:
      
     Example 2 - incorrect:
       
    The above example is incomplete:  He ran so fast that what happened?
    Example 2 - correct: 
       
    Now the "so" has been qualified, comparing his running speed with the record.
 

2. Consistency
    A.  Items being compared must have a basis in similarity; in other words, the basis of                  comparison must be logical.
    Example 1 - incorrect:
           
    The example above compares rugs to a store (Macy's)
     Example 1 - correct:

       
    The correct version compares rugs to rugs.
     Example 2 - incorrect:
       
    The example above compares opinions to private citizens.

    Example 2 - correct options:

       
    The correct version compares opinions to opinions.
    B.  A comparison needs at least two items to compare.
    Example 1 - incorrect:
       
    The "anyone I know" in the example above includes Jim.  Therefore, the above comparison         illogically compares Jim to himself.
    Example 1 - correct
       
    The correct version compares Jim (whom I know) to others I know.
 
   Example 2 - incorrect:
       
    The "anyone we have heard" includes Megan.  Therefore, the above comparison illogically compares Megan to Megan.
 

    Example 2 - correct:
       
    The correct version compares Megan to others we have heard..
    3. Clarity
    Example 1 - incorrect:
       
    In this example, the meaning is unclear.  The sentence could mean
         Jacqueline gave her sister more affection than she gave her brother.

                                                             OR

          Jacqueline gave her sister more affection than her brother gave to her sister.
 

    Example 1 - correct options:
       
        In each sentence above, the intended comparison is clear.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Subject Verb Agreement(SVA)

Direct and Indirect or Reported Speech

Active and Passive Voice